The editors of the 2012 Scenario have discussed our situation with regard to the conversation taking place here, on other blogsites, and in discussion groups on whether or not a planetary evacuation or relocation will occur.
We know that a new paradigm in lightwork is needed. We know that the mass arrests are removing what SaLuSa calls the dark ones and so issues with disinformation may soon ease. At the same time, it may never be the case that lightworkers will always agree and so the degree to which we can tolerate our differences will always present us with challenges that need to be met.
Admittedly a subject such as whether or not planetary evacuation or relocation is in our future is not a trivial issue, but a major matter potentially affecting large numbers of people so we don’t approach the discussion of it lightly.
Nevertheless the editors have decided to permit the discussion of both sides of the debate here as a departure from our usual practice. I’ve been asked to post this discussion as a personal article. I’m not speaking here for all the editors, but expressing my own viewpoint.
Factual matters remain factual matters but the establishment of what is accurate can be difficult. Drawing on channeled messages means that we rely on reports that sources post at intervals rather than continuously on, say, a daily basis as with the news.
In many cases, the sources offering these messages are not available to be questioned. Requests for supplementary information often cannot be made. Passages open to interpretation can confuse with no recourse available. It isn’t possible to expect complete information or certain knowledge in many cases.
In the end, after doing our due diligence, we may be left simply to accept the version that we prefer, that we are drawn to, or that appeals to our sense of accuracy, proportion, or appropriateness.
However, the disagreements that may arise between lightworkers need not come between us as colleagues. We can agree to disagree. And in fact we’ll need to do that more and more in the months ahead, given how much will be coming at us, most of it new, unknown, perhaps only partly understood. We need to explore whether we can disagree in some areas and still focus on and cooperate in the areas we agree on.
Moreover, as the dark cabal is ushered out of our society, we need to heal wounds, venture out of our foxholes, and begin to trust again. We need to join together to complete the work ahead of us, no matter what that work may turn out to be. So this site is exploring how that may be achieved and this article is one step towards that exploration, as controversial as the subject matter may be.
We’ll still need to make up our minds on issues. Therefore, what resources are available to help us do that?
(1) The inner voice. The inner voice is ultimately God but interimly our higher Self. I would imagine that probably all our sources would agree on the instrumentality of the inner voice to help us discern.
(2) The determination of the presence of contradictions, inconsistencies, improbabilities, implausibilities and impossibilities in a source’s account or in comparison with other accounts that we trust, which will allow us to arrive at an assessment of credibility.
(3) The opinions and arguments of sources which we ourselves have accepted as credible, whether from readings, the Internet, books, or in person.
Keeping these points in mind, let’s review the two sides of the debate on whether or not a planetary evacuation or relocation is in our future. In the end, you probably will need to decide what version of events you prefer. That may be the best outcome that can be hoped for at the present time.
Without doubt, I personally prefer one account over another and that is definitely reflected in the general content of this site. But my preference for that version has arisen only after assessing the credibility of all accounts and reflecting on the matters that that analysis has raised. My choice does not need to be yours – and it can be. However, choice is unavoidable. Whatever decision we arrive at, whether we may be conscious of it or not, whether we wish to acknowledge it or not, will have been our choice.
