Vatic Note: We called it early on based on evidence provided by another author and we posted his proof of the sloppy job the false flag operators did. Remember this accuseds' father is a big part of the Libor scandel that is brewing internationally. This set up may have been an attempt to prevent the father from testifying in court against those manipulating the Libor which resulted in Billions of dollars being fraudulently extracted from the markets.
Remember, this is also the case where one of the nurses alledgedly treating the victims of the shooting was killed in a unusual drowning situation just days after she treated the victims of the shooting. We posted a blog on here about that downing.
Look at that mans eyes, he is either mind controlled or drugged and if he is in prison, who is drugging him up for court? Is this the new gestapo railroad justice system we can expect from now on? WELL, LETS MAKE THIS GO VIRAL SINCE THE MSM ISN'T SAYING A WORD..... LETS MAKE IT GO WORLD WIDE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AND SEE IF WE CAN'T GET THIS MAN SOME HELP.
Aurora theater shooting court documents blows inside job conspiracy wide open AURORA THEATER SHOOTING
http://www.examiner.com/article/aurora-theater-shooting-court-documents-blows-inside-job-conspiracy-wide-open
SEPTEMBER 7, 2012BY: JEFFREY PHELPS
A seemingly
completely drugged individual alleged to be James Holmes, yet appearing
to be someone totally different, is seen barely able to stay awake next
to a very quiet defense attorney in a court and case that has been
suspect from the very beginning.
Credits:
RJ Sangosti-Pool / Getty Images
Newly released court documents in
the Aurora, CO theater “Batman massacre” case reveals startling inside
accusations about who may actually be behind the shootings that left at
least 70 people either dead or injured in the early morning hours of
July 20th.
Friday's report by
the online version of Denver's Westword Magazine details shocking
claims made by, what appears to be, a new victim in a case that has
throttled a community still in mourning over the tragic events.
According to the court documents an individual, whose name has been
officially redacted from the documents, came forward to file a “Motion
to Intervene” for the right to be reasonably heard under the Crime
Victims' Rights Act (a)(4), for the purposes of presenting newly discovered evidence to the court.
Corroborating much of a recent Conspiracy Examiner story maintaining the situation as potentially being another horrific (rogue government faction) conspiracy and possible false-flag event, the newly discovered evidence, thrown out of court by Judge William Sylvester days later, details stunning accusations against billionaire Philip Anschutz,
Police Chief Dan Oates, Arapaho County Dist. Atty. Carol Chambers and,
according to the alleged victim, the Illuminati as being potential
co-conspirators in the crime.
The stunning
accusations, dated August 27, reveal a startling story by the claimant
as having been visited at home by police chief Dan Oates and Dist. Atty.
Carol Chambers where they forced the unnamed individual to testify as a
fake victim of the shootings, under the threat of being arrested for
prostitution and escort services and charity fraud, for the purposes of
garnering an easy conviction against alleged shooter James Holmes.
But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on behalf of the conspirators and wants multiple individuals involved in the situation to take polygraph tests to prove their innocence.
But not before being shot by the police chief in “non-life-threatening areas” of the body, according to the motion, to appear as having been shot by James Holmes himself. The motion also claims that it is likely some of the victims in the theater were merely paid actors working on behalf of the conspirators and wants multiple individuals involved in the situation to take polygraph tests to prove their innocence.
Claiming that
their conscience will not let fraudulent testimony contribute to an
improper conviction of James Holmes, the new mystery victim asked that
the judge submit the case to the FBI and the US Congress for further
investigation into the alleged conspiracy. The judge, however, instead
of taking a closer look, decided to strike down the motion as
fraudulent, claiming the motion as likely forged by an individual or
individuals unassociated with the events.
The judge also suggested the situation be investigated by the Arapahoe County Sheriff's office and those responsible for the motion be taken into custody by the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services and “referred to the appropriate mental health agency.”
The judge also suggested the situation be investigated by the Arapahoe County Sheriff's office and those responsible for the motion be taken into custody by the Arapahoe County Department of Human Services and “referred to the appropriate mental health agency.”
But it may in
fact be the judge that needs the mental attention as all the evidence
collected in the case thus far seems to point toward mostly agreeing
with the individual who filed the claim, despite the media and the
court's attempts to suppress any evidence that doesn't support the
official story.
Multiple and corroborating eyewitness testimony stated what appeared to be multiple individuals involved in the shooting, including supporting official dispatch audio. Individuals interviewed by local media immediately after the event also claimed to have seen teargas canisters being deployed in the theater simultaneously from two different directions, in addition to side-by-side images of James Holmes prior to the shootings and the orange haired individual taken into custody as the alleged lone gunmen after the event looks startlingly like two different individuals. There also seems to have been two different gas masks found at the scene, in addition to other damning evidence that doesn't jive with the official version of the events.
Multiple and corroborating eyewitness testimony stated what appeared to be multiple individuals involved in the shooting, including supporting official dispatch audio. Individuals interviewed by local media immediately after the event also claimed to have seen teargas canisters being deployed in the theater simultaneously from two different directions, in addition to side-by-side images of James Holmes prior to the shootings and the orange haired individual taken into custody as the alleged lone gunmen after the event looks startlingly like two different individuals. There also seems to have been two different gas masks found at the scene, in addition to other damning evidence that doesn't jive with the official version of the events.
The individual
who filed the motion also added that they wanted their portion of the
charity to be donated to James Holmes' prison commissary, after using
the money to find Mr. Holmes “real” attorneys who are actually willing
to act in the honest defense of James Holmes, or the individual in
custody for the crime.
The motion, as
certified by the Arapahoe County Dist. Atty. and public defenders
offices, was sent via the United States Postal Service, then was quickly
denied and subsequently released days ago to the public for reasons yet
to be determined.
Perhaps one of
the most telling aspects of the circumstances, however, happens to be
the creepy dead silence about the motion by the media, especially
considering every little detail about a situation like this is normally
scrutinized at every angle after being groomed with a fine tooth comb
and examined under a microscope.
It was just weeks ago that certain local media outlets were considering suing for access to court records because,
according to those outlets, the community had a right to know so the
victims and the community could more easily begin the healing process
and find some semblance of closure. Perhaps information that may open
new wounds, however, regardless of how accurate or important that
information may be, may not be the kind of information they were looking
for.
