(CNN) -- Curious about life on Mars? NASA's rover Curiosity has now given scientists the strongest evidence to date that the environment on the Red Planet could have supported life billions of years ago.
Since Curiosity made its rock star landing more than a year ago
 at Gale Crater, the focal point of its mission, the roving laboratory 
has collected evidence that gives new insights into Mars' past 
environment.
NASA scientists announced in March that Mars could have once hosted life
 -- at least, in the distant past, based on the chemical analysis of 
powder collected from Curiosity's drill. An area of the crater known as 
Yellowknife Bay once hosted "slightly salty liquid water," Michael 
Meyer, lead scientist for the Mars Exploration Program at NASA 
headquarters in Washington, said earlier this year.
Six new studies
 released Monday by the journal Science add more insights about these 
formerly habitable conditions and provide other new knowledge that 
increase our understanding of the Red Planet. The results were also 
presented at the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San 
Francisco.
Curiosity found evidence 
of clay formations, or "mudstone," in Yellowstone Bay, scientists said 
Monday. Martian mud is a big deal because this clay may have held the 
key ingredients for life billions of years ago. It means a lake must 
have existed in this area.
"This is a game changer 
since these are the kind of materials that are very 'Earth-like' and 
conducive for life," said Douglas Ming, lead author of one of the new 
studies.
This ancient environment, where the clay minerals formed, would have been favorable to microbes, Ming told CNN.
Some bacteria on Earth 
called chemolithoautotrophs could have lived in that kind of 
environment. These bacteria derive their energy from breaking down rocks
 and sediments, Ming said, generally by oxidizing elements in the rock.
Ming and colleagues also 
found hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, sulfur and phosphorus in the 
sedimentary rocks at Yellowknife Bay, elements that are all critical for
 life.
The new findings mean 
the rover's $2.5 billion mission is "turning the corner," said John 
Grotzinger, a California Institute of Technology planetary geologist and
 chief scientist for Curiosity, also known as the Mars Science 
Laboratory.
Grotzinger and 
colleagues found the habitable environment existed later in Martian 
history than previously thought. By studying physical characteristics of
 rock layers in and near Yellowknife Bay, they determined that Mars was 
habitable less than 4 billion years ago -- about the same time as the 
oldest signs we have for life on Earth.
The habitable conditions
 could have remained for millions to tens of millions of years, with 
rivers and lakes appearing and disappearing over time.
Curiosity also helped 
scientists figure out the age of an ancient Martian rock, as described 
in the new research. The rock is called Cumberland, and it now has the 
distinction of being the first whose age was measured on another planet 
through chemical analysis.
The rover used a method 
for dating Earth rocks that measures the decay of an isotope of 
potassium as it slowly changes into argon. Scientists determined the 
rock was between 3.86 billion and 4.56 billion years old. This age range
 is consistent with earlier estimates for rocks in Gale Crater.
Scientists say roughly 4
 billion years ago, the environment on Mars wasn't much different from 
that of modern-day Earth. But things on Mars then took a drastic turn, 
and the planet was dramatically transformed from warm and wet to 
bitterly cold and dry, scientists say. In addition to the cold and dry 
conditions, scientists say the No. 1 reason life probably wouldn't have 
thrived on Mars is its extremely high levels of radiation.
"The radiation 
environment on Mars is unlike anything we have on Earth," said Jennifer 
Eigenbrode, a biogeochemist and geologist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight
 Center and an author of one of the studies. "We don't know if life on 
Mars could have ever adapted to the high levels of radiation the surface
 is currently experiencing."
Eigenbrode added, "This is a wide-open book, which we have barely started writing the pages of."
New radiation measurements will also be important to planning any human missions to Mars, scientists said.
"Our measurements also 
tie into Curiosity's investigations about habitability," study co-author
 Don Hassler of Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, said 
in a statement. "The radiation sources that are concerns for human 
health also affect microbial survival as well as preservation of organic
 chemicals."
Organic chemicals come from a variety of sources, including meteorites and comets, but they can also be indicative of life.
What's bad for us is bad for signs of life -- but these organic chemicals could still be hiding on Mars nonetheless.
 
