May 3rd, 2016
Infowars.com |
Editor’s Note: Whether you believe in the chemtrail conspiracy to poison our skies or not, Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars
highlights the dangerous precedent being set in courtrooms across
America. If you go against established lines of thinking or question the
official narratives, you are now a danger to those around you,
including your children.
A judge in Colorado ordered a
mother’s child to be removed from her custody because the mother’s
interest in “chemtrails” was a “fringe subculture” and represented a
threat to her daughter.
Boulder Judge Dolores Mallard told
Becca Vandb that her interest in the chemtrail conspiracy – which holds
that some contrails emitted by commercial and military aircraft are in
fact part of clandestine geoengineering programs – was a radical view
because “99% of people would know those are just contrails.”
Vandb said that the inquiry was
triggered after she raised the subject of chemtrails during a visit to
her daughter’s school and was immediately told to leave the premises.
“I can now only see my daughter with a
social security worker standing over me taking notes, and the judge
said this was so that if I mention chemtrails they would put a stop to
that. I am being railroaded for expressing my views about chemtrails,”
wrote Vandb, adding that she had not received any CPS visits nor were
there any allegations of child abuse made by the court or her daughter’s
school.
According to Judge Mallard, Vandb being “immersed in a fringe subculture” means “she is a danger to her daughter.”
“The school helped him take away
custody because I had the gall to argue with them when they severely
embellished my comments (made to adults only) about chemtrails,” Vandb told YourNewsWire.
Vandb’s Facebook page features numerous posts about chemtrails and other conspiracies.
Whether you believe in the reality of
chemtrails or not, the notion that the state can order someone’s child
to be seized because of their private beliefs – with no evidence
whatsoever of actual child abuse – is chilling.
What’s next? Taking people’s kids because they don’t agree with the “consensus” on man-made global warming?
Last year we reported on the Naughler family, who had their 10 children seized by police because of concerns over their off-grid, traditional lifestyle.
We also previously highlighted
the case of a father who was harassed by Child Protective Services
because he chose to only give his children organic food and refused to
let them drink unfiltered tap water.
Allowing the state to characterize
holding certain harmless beliefs or living completely legal lifestyles
as a form of child abuse is an incredibly dangerous precedent and should
be opposed at every turn.
Subscribe on YouTube
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.
