V.K. DURHAM AND LEE WANTA UNITE AGAINST HENEGHAN BLOG’S YELLOW JOURNALISM PROMOTING CIVIL UNREST
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
August 7, 2013, 8:30 P.M., EDT
V.K. DURHAM AND LEE WANTA UNITE AGAINST HENEGHAN BLOG’S YELLOW JOURNALISM PROMOTING CIVIL UNREST
There is no doubt that Tom Heneghan, a Chicago Democrat transplanted
to Progressive Los Angeles whose support for former Vice President Al
Gore (of carbon footprint and global warming fame) is legendary and
Heneghan is taking a stand in opposition to Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta
and V.K. Durham. The question is: “Why?”
Anyone who has followed Heneghan’s newsletters over the years knows
that he often appears to be a bomb with a pre-set time to go off. His
views are often radical. Over the years, many of his views have been
accurate… but if one looks at Heneghan claims of “done deals” versus
what has really proven to be the case, Heneghan has also provided much
misinformation. How many times has he told us the
Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols have been paid – and Wanta still
awaits a checkbook making it possible to pay the Protocols?
Ambassador Leo Emil Wanta and V.K. Durham, widow of Colonel Russell
Herrman/HERMAN (who held the $17 trillion in a gold bullion Contra
account which was the reason for an inexplicably cruel and inhumanely
torturous death) have only rarely stood together publicly. Each has
quietly supported the other because their end objectives have always
been the same. Both Wanta and Durham are American patriots whose
primary concern is to save the nation they both love. Each has his or
her own objectives as to how that should be done and their means of
achieving the objective to save America sometimes collide. That happens
even in the best of marriages – compatible objectives (regarding good
parenting of kids, for example) but different means of achieving the
objective.
It is rare that the two, Wanta and Durham, have taken a public and
united stand against what each of them view as dangerous incitement to
civil unrest contained in Tom Heneghan’s recent postings to his blog.
The primary objection of both Wanta and Durham focuses on Heneghan’s
encouragement of the American people to start a new American
“revolution.”