Reblogged From REDEFININGGOD.COM
Somewhere up in Heaven, they're
laughing. I was pondering what I'd cover in my next entry and
considering doing a nice, positive spiritual piece, then something
happened: a new Dolores Cannon interview appeared. Immediately, I knew
that Spirit had handed me my next assignment. I get to be the one who
offers the counterpoint to the kindly old grandma. How do I land all the
Just when I thought I could stop writing about deceptions...
...they pull me back in!
is necessary to contend with grammy, though, because her form of
channeling has produced a number of books that paint a potentially
misleading picture of the afterlife, which is a subject I'll discuss in a
future entry. But for now, I'll dust off an entry I wrote about Dolores
back on February 24 for the benefit of all the new readers. I've added a
new update at the bottom and might add another after I listen to her
most recent interview. Here goes....
I listened to a Dolores Cannon interview
yesterday, and while it was as uplifting and positive as her interviews
usually are, something just didn't sit right. She said that in all her
work over the years, she'd never encountered anything negative, which
struck me as an oversimplification if not an outright untruth. So I felt
led to go to my bookcase and dust off one of my many unread
metaphysical books, The Custodians, which was written by Dolores.
opening the book, I immediately came upon a relevant section. On page
259, she has a patient under deep hypnosis and is using her as a
communication conduit to talk to an "alien." While discussing the
practical precautions his species takes when abducting and returning
humans, the alien goes on to say...
"Other beings sometimes do
not return an Earth being. But that being probably would eventually
expire after a short period of time. We prefer not to do that, because
we are here to help. Some beings view human life in more animalistic
terms, and treat a being as you would a cow. You know, perhaps dissect
it for scientific reasons, just thinking of it as an unintelligent
animal. Usually never to eat or anything of that nature, and they
probably would wait until the being did expire before any type of such
experiments would take place. But we honor the life here. We have made a
commitment, in the council, to help the beings here, even though we are
So the being with whom she is speaking specifically tells her that there are not-so-nice aliens who abduct humans, usually not to eat them, and who usually
let them die before dissecting them like lab rats. I was surprised to
see such information in one of her books because in her interviews, she
makes it sound like there are no bad aliens, there is no Cabal, and all
is peaches and cream.
Knowing that the thesis of the book is that
alien abductions are misunderstood and are actually a positive
phenomenon, I went to the front of the book to see if she addressed the
dissonance. She did. On page 10, she writes about the aliens' reasons
"I do not believe they are doing this for
their purposes, but for ours. Of course, we have seen that there are
several different types of entities involved, and there could be some
negative types doing these things for their own gains. But I believe
these are in the minority, the renegades or mavericks of the UFO
In this passage, she says that there "could be" some negative types doing self-serving abductions, but the alien on page 259 specifically states that there are; there is no "could be" about it.
Based on her own personal beliefs, though, she ASSUMES (and y'all know
what that means, dontcha?) unfriendly abductions are a fringe activity.
That's a mighty big assumption, and it is the kind one makes when one
desires to come to a preferred conclusion and is willing to gloss over
evidence that runs counter to it.
Another thing that struck me
was how she compared humans on the Earth to fleas on a dog. This is
precisely the perspective expressed by negative aliens and their human
minions, which indicates that her consciousness has been influenced by
the entities she has been channeling through her patients. Hearing her
make that comparison reminded me of another writer named Patricia Cori.
In Chapter 2 of her book The Cosmos of Soul, Patricia offers a message from the "Sirian High Council":
primary disease is rooted in the excessive over-population. Like a
cancer, the population is multiplying at astronomical speed, killing off
the other healthy cells...
...The AIDS virus and others now
being prepared in your underground laboratories are simply population
control technologies designed to reestablish equilibrium in the body
count of the planet.
If you can see beyond the horror of such
widespread genocide, you may understand the bigger issue here. As man
has altered the balance and the population has run amok, some huge
catastrophe has had to occur to dramatically reduce your numbers, and
this the governments of the world understand."
The whole "if
you can just see beyond the whole 'genocide' thing, you'll see why you
need to die" message really gave me a belly laugh!
Much of the book sounded really good until I got to that part and saw
the agenda behind it. I would argue that it is NOT the number of humans
that is destroying the Earth; it is the nature of the sprawling,
purposefully inefficient, consumeristic, greed-driven slavery system
that is destroying it. And guess whose minions are behind the slavery
The dark ET/EDs dehumanize us and destroy our world with
their exploitation systems, then blame us for the destruction and ask us
to die. To them I say, "It's a clever trick, but it ain't happenin',
space bitches. It is not 'man' who 'altered the balance'; it was the
meddling of your own Cabal minions that unbalanced things." I'll write
more on "overpopulation" and other unintended consequences of the
Cabal's obsession with control and exploitation in another entry.
get back to my point, though, the dim view of humanity expressed by
Patricia and Dolores -- that we are a metastasizing cancer or
blood-sucking fleas -- is characteristic of the thinking of our own
"elites" and the ET/ED beings who pull their strings. While I don't
think Patricia or Dolores are dark beings, they are certainly picking up
strains of dark ideas from their undiscerning channeling efforts (and
yes, channeling is exactly what Dolores is doing during her hypnosis sessions).
On page 248 of The Custodians,
when Dolores begins to establish communication with the aforementioned
alien, she is specifically told by her hypnotized patient that what is
occurring is channeling...
Dolores: "Would he be willing to share some information with us?"
Patient: "He wants to channel through me."
...And since the consciousnesses she channels offer consistent themes, express ideas that sound
good, and can heal her patients' physical maladies, she has
uncritically accepted everything they've told her. Speaking from my
personal opinion, that just doesn't seem like a sound practice. And
using one's patients as high-bandwidth Ouija boards seems a bit risky as
Does this mean that all the entities who come through
during Dolores' sessions are bad guys? Not necessarily. I am careful to
never discount ALL channeled material because if dark beings can use
real or synthetic telepathy, good beings can too. I read all channeled
material to which I'm led, but I don't uncritically accept anything it
says. The environment in which we live absolutely requires constant discernment, and there is just no way around that.
the physical manifestations in our world clearly show, there are dark
beings about, and they have a plan for us. The low-level ones have been
putting us in a very bad position so the high-level ones can show up and
pose as heroes, and when they do, they'll be whispering sweet nothings
and speaking 99% truth. They'll do this so you'll swallow the 1% lie
that comes with it, and that lie is the poison pill that will really
screw a person up. So in my thinking, it seems wise to sharpen my
discernment, stand in my truth (even if others label me "negative" or
"obstinate"), and learn to spit, not swallow (ladies, please teach your
fellas how). In the end, those of the True Light who are fearless and
unmoved by dark deception will be left standing.
And so it is.
[Update 11 April 2013]
Here is an interview which offers an alternative perspective on the entities that can come through during hypnosis channeling: Super Woo Radio Episode 9 MP3.
It is an interview of Eve Lorgen by George Kavassilas which discusses
the Alien Agenda and hypnotic regression. The whole interview is good,
and it really gets rolling in the second hour.
[Update 26 June 2013]
Here is a blog
written by another hypnotist who follows Dolores' methods. If you take a
look through her various entries, you'll note how she transitions into
flat-out channeling of an entity that poses as "God/Creator." The key
difference between normal channeling and what she does is that she
allows the entity to possess her hypnotized and suggestible patient
instead of being possessed herself. Nice.
All this being said,
the entities who speak through channelings and show up at rituals have
been around for a long time and are known by many names. They are also
known to be flatterers who appeal to one's ego, and who mislead and
create mischief. Listen to them if you wish, but not with blind trust.
They mix in a lot of fool's gold with the real nuggets, so sift well.