Sabine K McNeill Update:
Ex-CIA Agent Susan Lindauer Interviews Sabine McNeillhttp://truthfrequencyradio.com/the-covert-report-w-susan-lindauer-50518/
and here’s the petition to reinstate my petition:
https://www.change.org/p/ben-rattray-ceo-of-change-org-reinstate-the-recently-taken-down-petition-the-rt-hon-theresa-may-mp-return-whistleblowerkids-and-abuse-survivors-to-their-russian-family-or-provide-a-full-explanation-as-to-the-reason-or-reasons-for-its-removal
http://whistleblowerkids.uk/the-judgement-19-03-15/
http://whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/03/19/sataniccult-dismissed-you-must-be-joking-damepauffley-knows/
http://whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/03/21/focus-on-highcourtjudge-pauffley-can-the-investigative-public-sack-her/
*********************
Hampstead Whistleblower Kids - Witness Statement by the Mother Ella Draper, 21 March 2015
https://youtu.be/rvzmxGkQDYA
*********************
Hampstead Whistleblower Kids - Judgement Day 19 March 2015
https://youtu.be/3prNKV6LsGA
*********************
UK Column News - Update On Satanic Murders In London UK - March 20, 2015
https://youtu.be/XpuyV71yz84
*********************
Revisit: Oprah Winfrey Exposes Satanic Ritual Child Abuse On Her Show
https://youtu.be/rh2yCle-LhY
*********************
Ed de Boer Op-Ed : PAUFFLEY'S VERDICT AND THE CHILDREN'S DESCRIPTION OF NAKED BODIES
Scroll Down to Read Ed's Op-Ed
*********************
The Judgement
But will the internet community of good people allow that to happen?
Abraham Christie was framed already in a ‘strategy meeting’ on 09 September 2015. He’s the ideal fall guy.
Here’s one comment by an astute observer:
- That judgement is the most disgusting, offensive garbage I have ever came across.
- Fact: no investigation has ever taken place.
- Fact: the character assassination of Dr Hodes is a disgrace and unlawful because she cannot give evidence against Dr Hodes as she has no credentials to do so!
- Fact: the character assassination of Mr Christie is unlawful as he has never been convicted as a predator and her claims are a complete lie because both the mother and Mr Christie got the children to GO TO the police!!!
- You tell me one person who is guilty that has tried to convict themselves? This does not happen!!!!
- Fact: this judge has to be arrested under EU law because none of the alleged were interviewed!
All in all, this judge is not fit for purpose and to say the children were coached is outrageous. If she feels that then where is the polygraph test!!! This woman will burn in hell for her sins.
http://whistleblowerkids.uk/the-judgement-19-03-15/
************************************************
#SatanicCult? Dismissed. You must be joking! #DamePauffley knows!?
Here is Ella, the children’s mother, speaking to partner Abraham who got them to talk and admit that it was their father who taught them to touch each other sexually. Their audio file on a video is on:
With a key point made by Ella:
- after the children retracted their allegations, why keep them in care?
- to protect the father and all his associates.
Thanks to commentator Sancho Panzer, the judgement is published here.
The Daily Mail reports – following a press release rather than investigating:
The Telegraph also:
- Satanic cult claims dismissed by judge
- Mrs Justice Pauffley says claims circulating on internet are ‘baseless’ as she describes people who seek to perpetuate them as ‘evil’ or ‘foolish’ after fact-finding exercise.
And I will forever maintain that it is not compatible with EU Directives to Use the Secrecy of UK Family Courts to Cover-Up Criminal Activities. MEPs will look into this emergency application to the Petitions Committee in Brussels.
You can’t make it up. But then it is hard to live in reality. We need to go through ‘societal disillusionment’ towards ‘social empowerment’.
So, what can you do? Formulate your response to the judgement and send it to the judge’s clerk: Barry.Clark@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
But: mind the gap between the internet community of good people advocating transparency and truth (99%) and the global elite (1%) using mainstream media (MSM) who thrive on secrecy and lies…
The battlefield has widened and our armies are growing, while the ‘bullets’ are being ‘sharpened':
- the blog is now www.whistleblowerkids.uk
- the US techie-version is on www.whistleblowerkids.com with a phenomenal list of ‘leaks’ about the non-existing satanic cults relying on papa and others killing babies
- a NZ ‘paper publication on-screen’ is on http://bit.ly/1FEwsgK or https://paper.li/BronnyNZ/1426379990#!headlines
- I have added lots of links of ‘co-creators’ to the blog
- I published the full story of the deletion of our two petitions – due to ‘court proceedings’ – here.
Dear Mr Mowrey
For you to have deleted two of my petitions, supposedly irretrievably, is a really serious violation of professional standards by an internet platform:
1. I just happened to have discovered your ‘Notice’ of 4 March, i.e. NOT an email as you claimed you sent!
2. Before removing petitions, your IT department MUST ensure that the petitioner has been ‘served’, i.e. has DEFINITELY received your ‘warning’!
3. To allow for mistakes, such as you with your Notice (rather than email with receipt confirmed) and your colleague Debbie not knowing about it, you MUST be able to RESTORE petitions!
If I didn’t have bigger fish to fry, I would certainly take you and Change.org to court.
This way, I trust that you’ll LEARN, as most people only seem to be able to learn from PAINFUL experiences, i.e. mistakes.
Yours with all possible customer dissatisfaction,
Sabine
www.sabinemcneill.co.uk
http://whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/03/19/sataniccult-dismissed-you-must-be-joking-damepauffley-knows/
************************************************
http://youtu.be/XpuyV71yz84FOCUS on #HighCourtJudge #Pauffley. Can the investigative public sack her?
The comments made by David on this video are excellent:
- parallels with Hollie Greig case in Scotland
- judges in secret family court system abusing the system.
1. HAMPSTEAD ALLEGED ABUSERS COME FORWARD TO BE EXAMINED
We demand that the alleged abusers of the Christ Church Primary School CE children, who were said to have distinguishing marks on their private parts, come forward to be examined by independent trusted doctors alongside trusted police.
This case is VERY difficult as the alleged abusers named included POLICE, CAFCASS, SOCIAL SERVICES, MANY teachers, parents, priests of various churches and others.
The #Whistleblower children allege they were part of a satanic sexual ritual abuse ring, with their father allegedly the cult leader. The children have told that some of the named have distinguishing marks on their private parts. None of them have come forward to prove this to be false. We demand this to be done NOW.
This is the online petition remaining after mine have been taken down with nearly 16,000 signatures: http://chn.ge/1v8VLVu?recruiter=43706425 PLEASE SIGN!
2. ANALYSIS OF THE SEPTEMBER 17TH POLICE INTERVIEW
This is one example of an individual initiative of careful listening with currently 48 comments. PLEASE TAKE NOTE!
3. LEAKED MEDICAL REPORTS END ALL DOUBT ABOUT SEXUAL ABUSE CLAIMS
Barnet Police did not wait for the medical results before closing the case. Again, please note that the internet community of good people is neither ‘evil’ or ‘foolish’, but as objective as the judge should have been.
4. FACT FINDING ONLINE
An excellent collation of videos examining the online presence of the alleged abusers. After all, there are some 70 of them on Hampstead Research.
The secret hearing in a civil family court was labelled ‘fact finding’. However, as an experienced McKenzie Friend writes:
the Judge has, in a civil court, undermined the Met Police investigations into harassment and child rapes by stating her findings in these criminal matters. Moreover by the naming of the parents the children’s identity will also be known where they now live/go to school and no doubt the children will now get bullied because of what is in the Press.http://whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/03/21/focus-on-highcourtjudge-pauffley-can-the-investigative-public-sack-her/
************************************************
MRS PAUFFLEY'S VERDICT AND
THE CHILDREN'S DESCRIPTION OF NAKED BODIES
Imagine your name is Mr. or Mrs.
Jones and you are a decent and honest person. All of a sudden, rumours are
appearing on the internet where you are mentioned as a member of a satanic cult.
Source of the rumours appears to be two children who claim to have been
sexually abused by the members of this group and to have been forced to witness
and to participate in ritual abuse and murder of babies! Not only do they
mention your name, they even give a description of your naked body, making
outrageous but detailed claims about things like tattoos on your private parts!
Now imagine that the entire story is
a fabrication, as Mrs Justice Pauffley concluded the 19th of March, after a
lengthy fact-finding period. (Her verdict can be read here: http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2015/26.html&query=ZC14C00315&method=booleant.)
How would you feel when out of the blue you are being accused of something gruesome
and absurd like this?! You would probably be horrified, devastated, anxious, confused
and ultimately very very angry. You would want such terrible and completely
untrue allegations to disappear immediately! But the rumours are spreading like
wildfire. There seems to be no way to stop them. You are completely innocent,
but you know that many people won't believe you, no matter what you say. All of
a sudden, your life has become a nightmare.
No wonder you will send complaints to
Youtube and other organisations where these allegations about you can be found.
You will do everything that is in your power to stop all this, even though it
seems a hopeless endeavour.
But then a sudden thought strikes
you. There is a way to put an end to the sick allegations! The children's description
of your body! Of course, how could you have forgotten about that! All you have
to do is have a doctor examine your body! There is no way the children could
have described your naked body with any degree of accuracy, could they? A
medical statement will make it completely clear that the children's description
is just a product of their fantasy, and as a result their whole story will fall
apart. Once you realize that this is a way out, you will probably want to have
this investigation done as soon as possible. The sooner an official statement
goes out that the children have been wrong on this point, the sooner the
wildfire on the internet can be quenched.
Now imagine your name is Mr. or Mrs.
Jones and you are a not so decent and honest person. Imagine that the
children's story does have a degree of truth. They did see your naked body
under circumstances you wouldn't want the whole world to know about. Their
description of your naked body, including of the tattoo on your private parts,
is in fact accurate. You have something to hide. How would your reaction be in
that case?
You would probably be equally
horrified, devastated, anxious, confused and very very angry. You would want the
allegations to disappear immediately! But the rumours are spreading like
wildfire. There seems to be no way to stop them. You know that many people
won't believe you when you deny everything, no matter what you say. All of a
sudden, your life has become a nightmare.
No wonder you will send complaints to
Youtube and other organisations where these allegations about you can be found.
You will do everything that is in your power to stop all this, even if it seems
a hopeless endeavour.
The one thing you will do differently
when you have something to hide is: you will not have your naked body examined
by a trustworthy doctor. On the contrary, you will try to divert attention from
this disturbing element in the children's story. You will hope that it will go
unnoticed.
What we have seen so far is that
weeks have gone by without anyone of the alleged abusers having stepped forward
to have his or her body examined, even though a petition was started on the
internet to urge them to do so (https://www.change.org/p/hampstead-alleged-abusers-come-to-be-examined-we-demand-that-the-alleged-abusers-with-apparent-distinguishing-marks-come-forward-to-be-examined-by-independent-trusted-doctors-and-the-police?utm_campaign=responsive_friend_inviter_chat&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=share_petition&recruiter=2844331).
And I find it very remarkable that Mrs Justice Pauffley hasn't made any mention
of this particular element of the children's story whatsoever in her verdict.
Mrs. Pauffley's verdict clearly has
the intention to be final and to put an end to all doubts. Therefore, it is all
the more remarkable that she has made no mention of this issue. Considering the
degree of thoroughness of her research, it is difficult to believe that she
overlooked it. One rather gets the impression she chose to ignore it. Did she
hope it will go unnoticed?
If judge Pauffley had wanted to put a
definitive end to all doubts, she ought to have addressed the issue of the
children's description and drawings of some of the alleged abusers' naked
bodies. Ignoring this issue will only add to the sentiment that crimes are
being covered up. Even by the judicial system.
Ed
de Boer, March 20, 2015
************************************************
