Wednesday, January 27, 2016

A Response Letter to Judge Anna, Judge Bruce, and Judge Roy by Oshawanna White Eagle

http://www.fabledwhiteeagle.com/images/eagle-flying.png
Oshawanna White Eagle

Please see the attached letter regarding the "Patriots" setting up COMMON LAW COURTS around the U.S. pertaining to the Burns, Oregon standoff.

Respectfully,

Oshawanna White Eagle





A RESPONSE LETTER TO JUDGE ANNA, JUDGE BRUCE, AND JUDGE ROY
RE:  “COMMON LAW ACTIONS”, AS WELL AS THE ACTIONS OF THE MILITIA & PATRIOTS OF BURNS, OREGON, & CONSTITUTIONAL ATTORNEY KRIS ANNE HALL
BY:  OSHAWANNA WHTE EAGLE – BLACKFOOT/ BIDAI TRIBE 0F JUDAH (SUN CLAN)
In regards to recent text comments between myself and JUDGE Anna Von Reitz, I feel that in all fairness to bring forth the issues discussed in a public forum for the sake of transparency for ALL people.

Judge Anna quoted “this is a NEW SYSTEM that is being put in place, a TRANSITION so to speak and a worldwide re-education of the people for an ORDERLY transition.”

She claims we must “CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED” in order to bring down and dismantle the Kingdom of Lucifer.  I forwarded by email a great article titled “A Tale of Two Kingdoms – Israel & Judea” which appeared in Veterans Today written & researched by Katherine Frisk which speaks of these bloodline inheritances as it is written in the bible and in alignment of my Native Indian heritage. With the bible being the supreme statute of the land under the Republic which Judge Anna is trying to restore, her comment of “these bloodlines are not to be taken literally” was of concern to me.

GOVERNANCE refers to all processes of governing, whether undertaken by a government, market or network, whether over a family, tribe, formal or informal organization or territory and whether through laws, norms, power or language. Therefore should we all not be saying “I DO NOT CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED”?


I commented on how the Patriots of the Republic constantly comment “it is what the Forefathers wanted”.  But I ask whose forefathers are you referring to? For if you do the “TRUE” research of the forefathers of the Republic you will find that the knowledge came from the Native Indians as well as did the Confederacy which was ignored by the British Crown when they conquered the lands and brought their English Laws with them. Once again the “TRUE” researchwill reveal that the British Monarch created their government as a “mirror image” of what the TRUE Creator gave the Hebrew Tribes which all Native Indians are descendants of the Twelve Tribes of Israel.

Judge Anna claims to have signed a Treaty with two of the largest Native Tribes of North America which gave all Native Indians back their Sovereignty.  Excuse me Judge Anna but Sovereignty is what makes us all equal and free and that is given at birth.  It is what we consider our “GOD GIVEN INHERITED INALIENABLE RIGHTS”.  I do not believe your piece of paper gives that merit, but rather discredits the “TRUE” meaning of sovereignty.

The Wikipedia definition of Treaty is an agreement under international law entered into by actors in international law, namely sovereign states and international organizations. A treaty may also be known as an (international) agreement,protocol, covenant, convention, pact, or exchange of letters, among other terms. Regardless of terminology, all of these forms of agreements are, under international law, equally considered treaties and the rules are the same. Judge Anna is this not what we are trying to rid ourselves of by being forced into contracts? Is that not Fraud as well as illegal under the Universal Commercial Code?

So now let’s take a look at the historical statements of those “creators” of international law and its sovereign states…..

The term “eminent domain” was taken from the legal treatise De Jure Beli et Pacis, written by the Dutch jurist Hugo Grotius in 1625, which used the term dominium eminens (Latin for supreme lordship) and described the power as follows:

            “. . . The property of subjects is under the eminent domain of the state, so that the state or he who acts for it may use and even alienate and destroy such property, not only in the case of extreme necessity, in which even private persons have a right over the property of others, but for ends of public utility, to which ends those who founded civil society must be opposed to have intended that private ends should give way.  But it is to be added that when this is done the state is bound to make good the loss to those who lose their property.”
Hugo Grotius’s work is also remembered for the Latin sentence which translated to English is as follows:
            “What we have been saying would have a degree of validity even if we should concede that which cannot be conceded without the utmost wickedness: that there is no God, or that the affairs of men are of no concern to Him.

Such a concept has been synthesized with the famous Latin phrase etsi deus non daretur, which means “even if God did not exist but is normally translated “as if God did not exist”.

Judge Anna which kingdom are you representing?  Psalms 94: 14 – For the lord will not cast off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance. Psalms 94: 20 – Shall the throne of inequity have fellowship with them, which frameth mischief by law? If you understand law as you represent; then you should know that “mischief in law” pertains to land more commonly known as “Allodial Titles”; which the Lakota tribe you signed a treaty with has in their possession. This “mischief in law” began back in the “Tudor Era” when the King of England was taxing the people with a high death tax so they found a “loophole” in the law and transferred their lands to a TRUST.  But the Trustees became corrupt and stealing from the TRUST which is how the COMMON LAW COURTS you say you represent came about in order to handle these types of disputes.  In these courts people were only given “USE” of their land but they could never outright own their land.  This is what is more commonly known as the “MORTGAGE” in society today.  Do you think our Creator intended for Mother Earth to have a “MORTGAGE” on her back? Proverbs 8 in the bible refers to Sophia (known as Mother Earth) as the “BRIDE OF THE LAW”.

As you claim your “Title of Nobility” under the Thirteenth Amendment as a JUDGE, in reality does that not make you a “servant” of the people; therefore you are in violation of what you are acting upon. Read my words clearly…….as a “TRUE NATIVE SOVEREIGN” I demand that you stop acting on my behalf or on the behalf of my children for you DO NOT HAVE MY CONSENT NOR MY PERMISSION. For the “KINGDOM OF GOD IS WITHIN ME”; therefore your kingdom is not my Creator nor my Superior Lordship.

Just as you claim to be working under Organic Law, it is a law, or system of laws, that forms the foundation of a government, corporation or any other organization's body of rules. A constitution is a particular form of organic law for a sovereign state. Read my words carefully Judge Anna….I DO NOT CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR ORGANIC LAW; for the bible states clearly that the Creator will destroy all Nations and any man ruled government for they are imperfect.

Being a “TRUE SOVEREIGN OF TEXAS” as a descendant of the Tribe of Judah, our lands were militarily conquered by Spain on behalf of the British Crown & the Roman Catholic Church.  Many of the Native Tribes lost their ancient teachings for they were forced to become Catholics or either be slaughtered. Spanish sir names were given to many Natives as well. But under “Customary Law” the Hebrew Tribes knew that ancestry lineage (DNA) was passed by the woman. For the woman has a womb that can carry the blood & flesh in order to bring forth ancestry DNA lineage; where the Catholic church teaches the opposite. The “Book of Enoch” speaks of this but the Catholic Church removed this book as well as others from the bible. Don’t you proclaim that you are a “Craddle Catholic”?  Revelations 22:19 -  And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of his prophecy, “God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book”.

The book of Enoch speaks of the “ONE DROP OF BLOOD RULE”, for the righteous who carry the one drop of blood of the Creator will be saved in these end times. For all Native Indians who have their ancient teachings know that the one drop of blood is of the ancient African bloodline. Could this explain why the earlier photos of the Ku Klux Klan wore the red Templar crosses on their gowns had a single black drop of blood which today has been changed to red? History shows that that they violence towards the Native Indians was to annihilate the bloodline of Cain. As I also pointed out in regards to the “Republic” that you are trying to save, it too practiced the “ONE DROP OF BLOOD RULE” but their practice was if a child was born between what was referred to as “mixed races” they chose the race of that child with the lesser race that they felt was not “SUPERIOR”.  Which is a very interesting part of history regarding the “Republic Forefathers” for Thomas Jefferson had many children with one of his black slaves in which these children were finally freed upon his death by will.

Judge Anna you stated in your writing about the 14th Amendment that we should not declare that we were slaves nor were our grandparents slaves which it is obvious that you are basing these facts entirely on the color of one’s skin.  For the Book of Enoch too discusses the “Whiting Out” for Noah’s parents were black skinned and Noah was born as an albino.  If you research Albinism you will discover that it is caused by “EMOTIONAL PAIN” which has created ancestral DNA weaknesses within all of us which is why people are all suffering with pain and disease today.  Therefore your comment about the Native people being obese and all being plagued with Diabetes because they eat too much meat and consume too much sugar is nothing more than a fallacy and part of the illusion in which you operate in.For Judge Anna, even though I am a descendant of this ancient Native Indian bloodline you will shocked to know that I have white skin and red hair! For a “wheel of life” has been completed here on earth and we are truly a family of ONE people. I like to refer to us as a “TRIBE OF MANY COLORS”.

But as I questioned you on these issues in a fair manner in order to express my truth & beliefs, your comment that “the Native people have suffered greatly. They have a natural desire to abuse others in turn—a sort of vengeance” As a “sworn” oath as a JUDGE aren’t you to be non-prejudice and non-bias? You commented that I was acting as if I was SUPERIOR; even though it has been you that has made yourself SUPERIOR to be acting on behalf of all the people of planet earth regarding their lands and inheritance WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT NOR THEIR PERMISSION?

Judge Anna let’s take a look at the infamous “Declaration of Independence” which people think gave them freedom from the British Crown:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for ONE people to dissolve all ties with Government which have connected them with another, and to ASSUME (to take responsibility) among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's Universal Creator entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Repeatedly in history an old military war strategy of “DIVIDE & CONQUER” has been used.  Divide the people and conquer the land and its natural resources. The causes of separation of the ONE people have been race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, and politics. To become ONE people only one question needs to be asked……”Do you believe in Love?”  And if the answer is yes, then virtues of compassion & empathy must follow.GOVERNANCE is the declared cause for the separation of the ONE people.

Through governance the Laws of Nature has become symbolic of the laws of the jungle; that the “only” law is to do whatever for survival. It has been the control & domination of the ONE people by governance that kept us in the constant thought of “I” rather than “We” of humanity.

And for the ONE people to ASSUME is to take responsibility among the powers of the earth, the separate & equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them.  Separate & equal station describes BALANCE. Which is to bring equal proportion to ALL ELEMENTS, to keep or put something in a stable position so that it does not fall.  All the trees, plants, and wildlife carry the same DNA markers as humans therefore they are included in this Law of Nature.  Don’t you realize that all the earthquakes, volcano’s erupting are evidence of an IMBALANCE here on Earth and with Mother Earth being the Bride of that law is it not evident that all of mankind is receiving a spanking for we are all responsible as ONE? Do you not realize that this is where the “COMMON GOOD FOR ALL COMES FROM”?

Declaration of Independence continued:

Whenever any form of Governance becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the ONE people to alter or abolish it, laying its foundation on such principles & organizing its powers as to them to affect their safety & happiness. When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

The truth, however, is that in 1861 the principle of freedom of association and right of succession was as widely understood and affirmed in the North as it was in the South.  AS the Brooklyn Daily Eagle editorialized on Nov. 13, 1860:

“The Union depends for its continuance on the FREE CONSENT
and will of the sovereign people of each state, and when that
consent and will is withdrawn on either part, their Union is gone.”

The New York Journal of Commerce concurred on Jan. 12, 1861 it warned:

“That a coerced Union, one in which states were forcibly
                restrained from secession, would change the nature of
government from a voluntary one, in which the people
are sovereigns, to a despotism where one part of the
            People are slaves”

So I ask, have we just become a lazy spoiled people?  Are we so concerned with “I” that we continue to hand over our responsibilities of our children, of our land, and of our planet to such greedy careless individuals or do we stand up and take back our responsibilities and lead by example for future generations of  “WE” of humanity?

With “WE” the People being the true power, we can claim BREACH OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. Under the law all levels of FIDUCIARYDUTY must be treated with the highest standard of care, but in the case GOVERNANCE it has violated this “Standard of Care” for the “COMMON GOOD OF ALL”

THE DUTY OF CARE.
THE DUTY OF LOYALTY.
THE DUTY TO ACCOUNT.
THE DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY.
THE DUTY OF FULL DISCLOSURE.
THE DUTY TO ACT FAIRLY.
THE DUTY TO GOOD FAITH & FAIR DEALING.

What is the “REMEDY” for this BREACH of contract?

(1) “WE” can demand FULL audits of all accounts.

(2) “WE” can file a claims against the Elected Officials role in embezzlement of our Children’s & Veterans Trust Funds.

(3)”WE” can ASSUME the responsibility of our children’s education rather than allow our children to be dummied down.

(4)”WE” can ASSUME the responsibility of managing our lands with equal balance and bring an end to the earthquakes and destructive oil spills.

(5)”WE” can ASSUME the responsibility of managing our wildlife, and conservation of the land.

The only limits that have been placed on us as ONE people are only those limits created by those we allow to place Governance on us!

Judge Anna you asked me not to be so defensive and to just relax for you are doing all of this for my best interest.  Well Anna, I am concerned as well as others should be as well for you are committing FRAUD.

I would also like to ask Kris Anne Hall who is also teaching Constitutional law to the people who claims to be a “Constitutional Attorney”, please at the request of the ONE people present a “Bar License” which to hold a title as an attorney you must have; therefore you too have claimed a title of nobility.  Any “TRUE” Constitutionalist will claim to be an INSTRUCTOR or COUNSELOR of law pursuant to the 5th Amendment to the National Constitution.

http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2016/01/a-response-letter-to-judge-anna-judge.html