Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2nd Amendment. Show all posts
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Friday, May 10, 2013
US government orders removal of Defcad 3D-gun designs
2013 05 10
From: BBCNews
The US government has demanded designs for a 3D-printed gun be taken offline.
The order to remove the blueprints for the plastic gun comes after they were downloaded more than 100,000 times.The US State Department wrote to the gun’s designer, Defense Distributed, suggesting publishing them online may breach arms-control regulations.
Although the files have been removed from the company’s Defcad site, it is not clear whether this will stop people accessing the blueprints.
They were being hosted by the Mega online service and may still reside on its servers.
Also, many links to copies of the blueprints have been uploaded to file-sharing site the Pirate Bay, making them widely available. The Pirate Bay has also publicised its links to the files via social news site Reddit suggesting many more people will get hold of the blueprints.
Cody Wilson, who founded Defense Distributed, told the BBC that the genie was out of the bottle.
"Once people heard what happened, Pirate Bay has exploded. I’m sat here watching it now, seeing the downloads go up and up."
[...]
Read the full article at: bbc.co.uk
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Sunday, February 24, 2013
All 67 Florida County Sheriffs sign pledge to protect the right of citizens to bear arms
This means all of Florida’s county sheriffs have now signed the pledge, the first state to achieve 100% compliance with the 2nd Amendment. The list is bi-partisan.
The following Florida Sheriffs have taken a stand to defend the second amendment:
Monday, February 4, 2013
Judge Napolitano: Second Amendment Was Written To Protect Right To Shoot Tyrants Not Skeet Shooting
Judge Napolitano: The Second Amendment was written to protect your right to Shoot Tyrants
Monday, January 28, 2013
DHS buys 7000 full-auto assault rifles, calls them ‘personal defense weapons’
Mike Adams
Natural News
Jan 28, 2013
In yet another huge blow to the rhetoric and narrative of the Obama administration and its desire to disarm the American public, a DHS bid has been uncovered (see documents below) showing that the Department of Homeland Security recently put out an offer to purchase 7,000 full-auto “assault weapons” to be used domestically, inside the USA.
Keep in mind that President Obama is on the record saying, “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals; that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.”
But it seems he really means they don’t belong on the streets of our cities unless they are in the hands of homeland security enforcers, in which case they can be FULL-AUTO assault weapons.
The DHS bid for 7,000 full-auto assault weapons is found by clicking here. The original credit for discovering this goes, to my best knowledge, to Awr Hawkins at Breitbart.com.
In the hands of the government, they’re called “Personal Defense Weapons”
The juiciest part of this bid is the use of the phrase “Personal Defense Weapons” to describe the full-auto AR-15s being purchased by DHS.
Apparently, when YOU hold an AR-15, it’s an “assault rifle.” But magically, if you hand that same rifle to an armed government homeland security enforcer, it instantly transforms itself into a “personal defense weapon.”
Natural News
Jan 28, 2013
In yet another huge blow to the rhetoric and narrative of the Obama administration and its desire to disarm the American public, a DHS bid has been uncovered (see documents below) showing that the Department of Homeland Security recently put out an offer to purchase 7,000 full-auto “assault weapons” to be used domestically, inside the USA.
Keep in mind that President Obama is on the record saying, “AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals; that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities.”
But it seems he really means they don’t belong on the streets of our cities unless they are in the hands of homeland security enforcers, in which case they can be FULL-AUTO assault weapons.
The DHS bid for 7,000 full-auto assault weapons is found by clicking here. The original credit for discovering this goes, to my best knowledge, to Awr Hawkins at Breitbart.com.
In the hands of the government, they’re called “Personal Defense Weapons”
The juiciest part of this bid is the use of the phrase “Personal Defense Weapons” to describe the full-auto AR-15s being purchased by DHS.
Apparently, when YOU hold an AR-15, it’s an “assault rifle.” But magically, if you hand that same rifle to an armed government homeland security enforcer, it instantly transforms itself into a “personal defense weapon.”
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Is Bank of America Stopping Gun & Ammo Purchases?
Before we begin you should take a look at this YouTube video of someone who makes a phone call to Bank of America to verify if they are truly blocking purchases of guns and ammo. Watch and listen to the shocking response from a Bank of America employee.
So what do think? What questions are popping in your mind as you witness this happening?
Is it true that one of the largest banks in the United States is stopping payments made on gun and ammo purchases? We see from the video that Bank of America is taking your rights away as an American citizen and believes that the United States constitution and the second amendment is null and void. I can imagine a foreign dictator coming to America to implement new laws that ban the sales of guns and ammo but coming from an American corporate institution is shocking. But than again, there is much talk of American banking institutions that are owned by foreign entities who do not abide by the USA constitution, but I digress.
Now let us take this a step further, and remove the idea of purchasing guns and ammo. If they can eliminate your constitutional right to own a gun , what will stop them from implementing new policies that will tell you what you can and cannot purchase?
It is my opinion that Bank of America is dictating to its customers what they think is appropriate and what they think their customers can buy. This new policy has just reached a "slippery slope". Many would say that Bank of America just slipped and bumped it's head and is now sliding down a slope made of smooth ice with an overlay of super slippy grease and at the end of the steep slope would be a hungry lion waiting to devour and destroy such a draconian policy.
How does a banking institution have the right to tell someone what they can purchase and how to spend their money? It appears they do have the right to tell people what they can and cannot purchase.
Here are some additional and slightly rhetorical questions......
What's next? Bank of America going to tell us that we cannot purchase chocolate ice cream because it has too much sugar and fat?
Will other major banking institutions fall in line with these draconian policies and tell the people what they can do with their hard earned money?
Will main stream media ignore this story?
Is this the New World Order trying to battle their way back in power or are they still in power?
Will you be switching to another bank that will not tell you how to spend your money and protect your constitutional rights?
What are we going to do about this?
FYI: I went to the Bank of America website to see if any press releases have been issued to the public but nothing has been published as of January 15, 2013.
If you want to make your voice heard than you may want to contact Bank of America customer service at 877-231-9372 or contact them at their website link here.
Feel free to leave a comment and express what you think about this.
My best to all.
~enerchi
www.ascensionwithearth.com
P.S. Thank you to Slaade for reporting this to us.
**************************************************************************
Update: Another Side of The Story Emerges..... http://www.examiner.com/article/video-bank-of-america-debit-cards-cancel-all-gun-and-ammo-sales?cid=rss
Monday, January 14, 2013
Gun Confiscation - Last Refuge of the Tyrant
Gun Confiscation - Last Refuge of the Tyrant
Few polarizing subjects are more hotly debated than gun control. Usually lost in the fray of emotional diatribes to ban guns, are the historic empirical foundations of our forefathers who fought a revolution to escape from imperial tyranny. The true reality in today’s AmeriKa is that individual liberty is the most despised activity that any citizen can exert in their lives. Both the popular state worship culture and the authoritarian hoodlums that run the government are so fearful of armed independent citizens, that they are eager to burn the Bill of Rights. Face it, the government is committed to force you to be a ward of the state and will kill you if you resist.
Because
of government school propaganda, those indoctrinated during the last
several decades are woefully lacking in the knowledge of their own
heritage. Phyllis Schlafly writes in, The Founding Fathers On Right To Bear Arms, and reminds of the essence in the Second Amendment.
Patrick Henry: "The great objective is that every man be armed. . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." George Mason: "To disarm the people [is] the best and most effectual way to enslave them." Samuel Adams: "The Constitution shall never be construed . . . to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." Alexander Hamilton: "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." Richard Henry Lee: "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." "The chief reason America has remained a free country is the widespread private ownership of firearms. Individual ownership of guns made the American Revolution possible. The principal purpose of the Second Amendment was to maintain our freedom from government. It is an insult to our heritage to imply that the Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment just to protect deer hunters." |
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Friday, January 11, 2013
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Wyoming Threatens Arrests for Federal Gun Grabbers
Thank you to an AWE viewer.
Local radio station KTWO reports that lawmakers in Wyoming have proposed a "Firearms Protection Act" that provides a state-level annulment of any ban against semi-automatics or magazines that hold 20 or 30 rounds or more.
If the measure passes, it would mean that anyone--even federal agents-who try to enforce a ban within the state borders could be charged with a felony.
Is this the wave of the future for "red" states concerned about Obama's strong anti-gun intentions?
It is too early to tell. But it is worth noting that Montana lawmakers began pushing for the same kind of legislation as soon as conservatives took control of that state's legislature in 2010.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/10/Wyoming-Lawmakers-To-Federal-Gun-Grabbers-Don-t-Tread-On-Us
As details continue to emerge regarding gun control plans that
President Barack Obama and the Democrats are pushing behind the scenes,
Wyoming lawmakers have a message for the federal government: "Don't
tread on us."
Local radio station KTWO reports that lawmakers in Wyoming have proposed a "Firearms Protection Act" that provides a state-level annulment of any ban against semi-automatics or magazines that hold 20 or 30 rounds or more.If the measure passes, it would mean that anyone--even federal agents-who try to enforce a ban within the state borders could be charged with a felony.
Is this the wave of the future for "red" states concerned about Obama's strong anti-gun intentions?
It is too early to tell. But it is worth noting that Montana lawmakers began pushing for the same kind of legislation as soon as conservatives took control of that state's legislature in 2010.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/10/Wyoming-Lawmakers-To-Federal-Gun-Grabbers-Don-t-Tread-On-Us
Gerald Celente - Tommy Schnurmacher Show - January 8, 2013
Published on Jan 8, 2013
Gerald talks with Tommy Schnurmacher on gun control. www.TrendsJournal.com
Ron Paul Warns of 2nd American Revolution if Obama Bans Guns with EO
If there is any part of this video you should watch, pay attention to what Alex Jones says starting at 17:15 - 17:35 of the video. What are the birdies saying ?
Assault Rifle vs Hammer - Who Kills More?
Picture found at NESARA BLOG
Not sure if this is accurate stats but if it is, makes you think at little more about the agenda of the US government over gun control. In case you missed the rebuttal on statistics from Ben Swann against Peirs Morgan, take a look at the video below.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




