By FRANK JOSEPH
The most important questions we can ask are about ourselves, not only as individuals, but as a species. Where did we come from? How did we get here? A question that has bedevilled us for as long as we can remember is: Where and when did we take the step from savagery to civilisation?
Mainstream historians, who write our textbooks, insist they know: in Mesopotamia, about 5500 years ago. But they are contradicted by places like Chatal Hueyuek, a 13-hectare condominium village that flourished as part of a much broader urban centre in central Turkey, 15 centuries earlier. More ancient still, archaeologists excavated a nine-metre-high, stone castle in the Near East, at Jerico, that is a 1000 years older. The sophisticated level of construction at Chatal Hueyuek, Jerico, and similar, pre-fourth millennium BCE sites proves they were not the first of their kind, but must have developed from much older precursors. Just who were these precursors, and how far back into prehistory did they lay the foundation for all subsequent civilisations, including our own?
This was the question that sparked more than ten years of concerted research and world travel. I found clues left behind by the long-dead ‘Cliff-Dwellers’ of the American Southwest; among the living oral traditions of Polynesia, Micronesia, Melanesia, Australia, and New Zealand; and in the pre-Buddhist temples of Japan and Southeast Asia.
The accumulated evidence compelled me to conclude that mankind’s first civilisation gradually arose in the Pacific around 50,000 years. This period coincided with the Upper Paleolithic, or Late Stone Age, famous for its cave-art in southwestern France, and lowered sea-levels, allowing for occupation of Australia by exposed land-bridges. For the next 38,000 years of relative peace and isolation, the Pacific islanders developed the scientific and spiritual arts to high degrees of sophistication through close observance of natural law.
1. . . the two beings who had to incarnate again and again experiencing horrific suffering in order to (basically) redeem us. I wonder if it was really necessary?
A being can only heal something, when this being experienced and felt the thing that needs to be healed. There is no healing possible out of the ego, because the ego itself is part of the detachment that blocks true and deep empathy, and empathy is the key to healing.
2. Wouldn’t it have been possible to stop the game before maturity to avoid all the suffering the crack of Atlantis caused?
. . . it was Gaia, our planet, that asked God for help, and it happened mainly out of love towards . . their pearl . . that the Elderer decided to keep the game running and heal the crack from within. If they would have put an end to the game this would have meant to dissolve Gaia with all her inhabitants. . . this healing took 16000 years, which is rather quick in the cosmic context, and it also was quick facing the amount of healing that needed to be done and still needs to be done.
3. Did the Lemurian souls originate on Earth as higher dimensional beings who gradually became more physical?
Yes, the Lemurians came to Earth as ethereal beings and became more and more dense over the time. Here, within the game of separation, the soul(My addition=Higher Self/Ba) hardly had any access to the human beings, which lead to the circumstances that humans forgot who God is.