Saturday, December 21, 2013


Source Link: WikiArmy.Com

Paul Warburg - member of Temple Emanu-El in New York City, a Jew. (1896-1969) son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through James\' brother Max, banker to the German government, Chairman of the CFR and first Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Alot of internet types are opining on the Federal Reserve 100th anniversary this year about this time.

Of course and as usual they are factually incorrect.

The law was snuck in and passed during Christmas week, a gentile holiday despised by certain reformist Jews to that were behind the law in 1913 but in fact the corporation was not formed until September of 1914.

As we can see by the evidence below it was formed as a non-profit type of corporation which is really a laugh!

If you do your research you will find that the Rothschilds and many others have hundreds of corporations formed in Delaware after this main one. I do not think many will as AltMedia is filled with lazy followers not intellectual people.

I am also quite sure none of the AltMedia fruitcakes that people listen to like Webster Tarpley (a commie pinko), Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Gordon Duffle Bag or Larry Klayman ever told you about JP Warburg.

So I will since it is very relevant:

James \"Paul Warburg (August 18, 1896 – June 3, 1969) was a German-born American banker. He was notably well known for being the financial adviser to Franklin D. Roosevelt. His father was banker Paul Warburg, member of the Warburg family and father of the Federal Reserve system.

February 17, 1950, appearance before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in which he said:

I am James P. Warburg, of Greenwich, Conn., and am appearing as an individual.

I am aware, Mr. Chairman, of the exigencies of your crowded schedule and of the need to be brief, so as not to transgress upon your courtesy in granting me a hearing.

The past 15 years of my life have been devoted almost exclusively to studying the problem of world peace and, especially, the relation of the United States to these problems. These studies led me, 10 years ago, to the conclusion that the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means.

We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.

Today we are faced with a divided world—its two halves glowering at each other across the iron curtain. The world\'s two superpowers—Russia and the United States—are entangled in the vicious circle of an arms race, which more and more preempts energies and resources sorely needed to lay the foundations of enduring peace. We are now on the road to eventual war—a war in which the conqueror will emerge well nigh indistinguishable from the vanquished.

The United States does not want this war, and most authorities agree that Russia does not want it. Indeed, why should Russia prefer the unpredictable hazards of war to a continuation of here present profitable fishing in the troubled waters of an uneasy armistice? Yet both the United States and Russia are drifting—and, with them, the entire world—toward the abyss of atomic conflict.

Source - Click Here To Read the Source

Corporate Doc shots below: